Skip to Content

Open and Obvious Doctrine in Michigan


A hazard is considered open and obvious if a person, who only has average and ordinary intelligence, would have discovered the hazard upon casual inspection. 

This helps the landowner or the landlord in a situation where a personal injury, in the case of a slip and fall, happens on his property. If the ordinary person would have known that there is a hazard and neglected to act reasonably in a way that an ordinary person would act, then the law would treat the injury to be in the same league as if it is not the responsibility of the property owner.

When are examples of hazards considered Open and Obvious in the State of Michigan?

The following are some situations when a hazard is considered open and obvious:

  • Parking lot owners in case of slip and fall in a parking lot where it is snowing and in freezing temperatures. Since an ordinary person would take reasonable care, then the parking lot owner is free from liability.
  • In case of a slip on a wet floor that is marked as wet and hazardous, the property owner is free from liability.

Legal Backing of Concept

The concept of open and obvious doctrine in the State of Michigan is discussed in the case text in Michigan jurisprudence. In Lugo v. Ameritech Corp464 Mich. 512, 516-17 (Mich. 2001), the Court provided the following discussion:

In general, a premises possessor owes a duty to an invitee to exercise reasonable care to protect the invitee from an unreasonable risk of harm caused by a dangerous condition on the land. Bertrand v Alan Ford, Inc, 449 Mich. 606, 609; 537 N.W.2d 185 (1995). However, this duty does not generally encompass the removal of open and obvious dangers:

[W]here the dangers are known to the invitee or are so obvious that the invitee might reasonably be expected to discover them, an invitor owes no duty to protect or warn the invitee unless he should anticipate the harm despite knowledge of it on behalf of the invitee. [ Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corp, 440 Mich. 85, 96; 485 N.W.2d 676 (1992).]

Accordingly, the open and obvious doctrine should not be viewed as some type of “exception” to the duty generally owed to invitees, but rather as an integral part of the definition of that duty. This Court further elaborated in Bertrand, supra at 611:

When §§ 343 and 343A [of the Restatement Torts, 2d] are read together, the rule generated is that if the particular activity or condition creates a risk of harm only because the invitee does not discover the condition or realize its danger, then the open and obvious doctrine will cut off liability if the invitee should have discovered the condition and realized its danger. On the other hand, if the risk of harm remains unreasonable, despite its obviousness or knowledge of it by the invitee, then the circumstances may be such that the invitor is required to undertake reasonable precautions.

In sum, the general rule is that a premises possessor is not required to protect an invitee from open and obvious dangers, but, if special aspects of a condition make even an open and obvious risk unreasonably dangerous, the premises possessor must undertake reasonable precautions to protect invitees from that risk.

Now that you know the legal backing of the open and obvious doctrine in the State of Michigan, you should now be ready for other topics we need to cover.

Haque Legal Has Your Back

Here at Haque Legal, we always have your back. Make sure that on your first free consultation, we tell you everything that you need to know about your case as well as the cost and the expenses that would be associated with the filing of your case.

The consultation is free for the first time because we understand that you need to at least have that guidance coming from a reputable law firm and lawyer to assess your case. If you have a personal injury case and you need a lawyer to handle it you can always contact our law firm and we can talk about your situation and the best way that we can handle it, especially in terms of the expenses.

Let Haque Legal Help You With Your Case

If you require a lawyer who can assist you with ensuring that you protect your rights, it is important to know that you also have a team that can help you out with your specific needs. 

Our law firm is dedicated to making sure that those who are innocent will be protected by the law and that the full extent of justice will be used.


The article that you have read is based on general applications of the law. It is not legal advice and it is not to be construed as any legal consultation with the firm. No client-attorney relationship is created when you read the articles we have provided.

Let us help you out

If you need a lawyer to help you during your proceedings, call us immediately. If you have any problem with the law or are seeking justice and truth, our numbers are standing by to take your call. As your Southfield Premises Liability Attorney, we are here to help.

The post <strong>Open and Obvious Doctrine in Michigan</strong> appeared first on Haque Legal.

Share To:


Contact Our Legal Team Today
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy